The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what if we just lowered it to two point two would that have an effect all things equal well the answer is it would have a staggering effect the number of total infections would go down from a hundred and forty three million to thirty five million and most importantly the total fatality goes from one point four million to three hundred thirty three thousand
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now the number of cases goes up for one hundred forty three million two hundred seventy eight million the number of deaths goes from one point four to one point eight million