The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
sort of another very interesting part of that study is that only about a quarter of those men had normal seam quality um so sort of very concerning you know it was I guess reassuring that it wasn't further declining but very concerning that only a quarter of Danish men had you know normal Seamon quality
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what they found is actually that seam quality was fairly uniform over about 20 years where they had data