Andrew Huberman· PhD
But it wasn't sleep has fought its way through heroically every step along the evolutionary path.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
But it wasn't sleep has fought its way through heroically every step along the evolutionary path.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Sleep has fought its way through heroically, you know, every step along the evolutionary path.
does it strike you as odd that evolution would have designed us to spend a third of our life not mating not watching out for predators not hunting for food but doing this thing for some other purpose do you think that thing must have been important
evolution went to great lengths to do this and superficially at great cost to us right i mean you could argue well imagine you didn't need to sleep and you could spend 24 hours a day foraging for food or a mate or some other thing but it didn't so it's sort of it's sort of like there's probably a reason we are not anaerobic to your point about reducing oxygen saturation by 25 you know if you were to think about that you know during sleep just as you said you're not eating you're not finding food you're not finding a mate you're not reproducing you're not caring for your young you're vulnerable to predation on any one of those grounds but especially all of them put together as a collective completely anti-evolutionary it sounds like the dumbest thing