The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I mean there's a there's an argument in May that that that this disease this malfunctioning of the human body this diversion away from the way it's supposed to work is because of some internal system that gets turned the wrong way the immune system starts to fight against itself recognizes you know self it doesn't recognize self so I I like that simplified concept that not only you know is all disease sort of autoimmune in nature or certainly inflammatory in nature
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.