The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in terms of people having this kind of psychotic response it is pretty rare I mean and I say this because I can think of Canada kind of whenever it's happened and someone has actually done something wildly unpredictable because they've had a psychotic response to cannabis it tends to make headlines so it's not it's not common
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.