The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
then the modern approach involves a two millimeter drill hole in the skull down which you can pass a little fiber optic uh cannula and and uh attach it to a laser and just heat the tumor up deep inside the brain under direct MRI visualization in real time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so that procedure that you just described translates into better clinical outcomes meaning fewer let's call them side effects or collateral damage