Andrew Huberman· PhD
if accuracy is important you need to slow down take your time take as much time as needed to get it you know the most information that you can
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if accuracy is important you need to slow down take your time take as much time as needed to get it you know the most information that you can
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the more time you take the more evidence you can accumulate and when you you have to recognize that the data your brain is taking in from the environment is noisy right it's not perfect it's noisy because of the environment it's noisy because the wet where the brain is statistical and and biological so you can make the wrong choice by virtue of the noise dominating the signal and that happens when you go too quickly