We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
it is advised that on children younger than 6 months of age you do not use chemical based B sunscreens why well young skin even the skin on the external part of the body in children 6 months or younger acts more like mucosal skin in that it can very easily absorb things transdermally through the skin
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
do not put chemical based sunscreens on really young kids
in fact for young kids particularly those six months and under the American Academy of Dermatology and the American Academy of Pediatrics generally recommends avoiding chemical sunscreens why children's skin particularly infants and toddlers behaves more like mucous membranes than adult skin their barrier is not as tightly woven so they absorb these things at a much higher concentration