Andrew Huberman· PhD
The trick is that instead of BPA, they use BPS. Sneaky rats. And BPF. That's so sneaky. And these are chemicals, these are lookalikes, they're analogs, and they're just as harmful.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The trick is that instead of BPA, they use BPS. Sneaky rats. And BPF. That's so sneaky. And these are chemicals, these are lookalikes, they're analogs, and they're just as harmful.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.