Peter Attia· MD
2.6 percent right 10 509 over that is the absolute risk and similarly when you divide this number by this number you get 0.89
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
2.6 percent right 10 509 over that is the absolute risk and similarly when you divide this number by this number you get 0.89
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
overall number of severe critical cases was 19 in the vaccine group and 80 in the placebo here's where i punted when i calculated the absolute risk i punched the 19. i divided 19 by total cases carelessly and 80 by total cases carelessly and got an elevated ar absolute risk um obviously here i've corrected that this number is correctly shown as the uh overall number number of severe critical cases by the total number of participants not cases