Paul Saladino· MD
we cannot use observational epidemiology as the gold standard that is the problem we cannot do that
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
we cannot use observational epidemiology as the gold standard that is the problem we cannot do that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you are you are saying now that that we should use observational epidemiology as the gold standard and i would disagree with that 100 percent that's not mainstream medical science says no no way that's not the gold standard at all