The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a reason that to my knowledge virtually every study that compares meat eaters to non-meat eaters finds an advantage amongst the non-meat eaters and we can talk about lifespan Advantage yes and we can or disease you know incidence uh studies and yeah it might be tempting to say well therefore eating meat is bad
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.