The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if we can marry the two civilizations because right now we know how to prevent infectious disease and we have sanitation and infant mortality is is rare and we know which foods we need to get micronutrients and we don't experience famine very often unless we're in a very dire straight financially and so we can avoid all the things that they died of and if we can now avoid all the things that we are dying of we can have the best of both worlds
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.