Peter Attia· MD
the restorx because of it's the ability I think to bend in the opposite direction you could shorten the time that you have to wear it
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the restorx because of it's the ability I think to bend in the opposite direction you could shorten the time that you have to wear it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but the restorex because it's the ability I think to bend in the opposite direction you could shorten the time that you have to wear it 30 minutes twice a day wow um is there a critical window in which that works going back to Peyronie's disease where you have to do it during that 12-month period and thereafter it becomes very difficult for it to be successful
the one that has could take gotten the most uh interest is one as the Mayo Clinic called the restorex because the restorex you actually bend it in the opposite direction where you're curving in the flat to say it actually bends so if you're curving up you can bend it down left you bend it right and you hold it there for 30 minutes at least twice a day for three months
the old stretching devices were two to six even up to six hours a day uh but they were not bent in the opposite direction they were just straight and so it was two to six hours a day every day um for at least three months but the restorex because it's the ability I think to bend in the opposite direction you could shorten the time that you have to wear it 30 minutes twice a day