The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and i do think that at least my hypothesis might be or where my mind has gone now is like maybe these compounds aren't harmful for us or maybe it's just beneficial to get them uh via proxy of an animal that's already processed them properly as an evolutionary herbivore i just i kind of come back to this and as you know i'm not sure how familiar with my work uh you are but i i've become a fan of fruit in the last uh year for a few years
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.