The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And there's a lot of implications here for the potential to use stem cells perhaps to treat aging and a lot of people like these other things we were talking about, are really excited about this potential avenue for anti-aging.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's very hard to have this above noise right now because of a total absence of data not because there isn't biological plausibility there really is but it's just there's no data