The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is a really incredible study from loma linda which is one of the blue zones it's actually home or that he lived and i think he was a professor at Loma Linda University Medical School and they looked at sperm quality and we know that in males motility of sperm and sperm quality is a measure of nutritional adequacy and what did they find in vegans and vegetarians in loma linda very poor and sperm hypo motility and very poor sperm numbers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and we see that there is a correlation between increased plant and vegetable and decrease sperm quality perhaps the LOM lindin in this study are the extreme example there with the complete uh exclusion of meat being very harmful for the sperm quality