The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And Eric Kudson did these amazing well he did a lot of seminal work for how we understand the auditory pathways as well as how we form multiensory objects and and the way the brain integrates um you know cells data from across our modalities meaning you know sight and sound. Um but in this paper what he was doing was he had identified cells in the brain that optimally responded their receptive fields.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.