The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Um I think there are multiple theories about how intrinsic motivation works and I'm drawing for those expert readers, expert listeners from the attributional approach. Um and what matters here is the conclusions one draws from one's actions. Why am I doing this? As that depending on how I answer that will dictate how my motivation flows.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.