We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
i'm not completely convinced by this theory for a number of reasons if you want to generate more uric acid in the human body not only do you have to lose the uric mutation you have to have many changes in the kidney physiology to retain the uric acid because we're not peeing it out so you have to reabsorb it to something that humans actively do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The theory that the loss of the uricase mutation in humans which is an enzyme that breaks down uric acid was connected with our propensity to develop body fat and survival I'm not completely convinced by this theory for a number of reasons if you want to generate more uric acid in the human body not only do you have to lose the uricase mutation you have to have many changes in the kidney physiology to retain the uric acid because we're not peeing it out so you have to reabsorb it which is something that humans actively do