Andrew Huberman· PhD
The ratio - varies, also based on severity - Mm-hmm. - but generally, it's been one to four, so, more males than females.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The ratio - varies, also based on severity - Mm-hmm. - but generally, it's been one to four, so, more males than females.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you know the older literature says it was ten to one boys to girls and that's because boys are so floored in their their presentation and symptoms girls can camouflage it better they can mask it better they are often verbal but they have very high rates of comorbidities like obsessive compulsive disorder or adhd attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or even a lot of the teenage girls with bulimia and eating disorders now many of them may be on the autism spectrum so we're getting better at it so it used to be ten to one now i think it's moving closer to three to one boys to girls and some say it may even approach parity or something close to parity like 1.5