Andrew Huberman· PhD
The rate which we age is not linear! Perhaps the single greatest acceleration in our rate of aging is puberty.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
The rate which we age is not linear! Perhaps the single greatest acceleration in our rate of aging is puberty.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the fastest rate of aging that any of us will ever undergo is puberty.
And yet the way you describe these changes in the epigenome, and the way you have framed aging as a disease, leads me to ask: Are periods of immense vitality the same periods when we're aging faster?
that development is the most rapid period of aging ever. Look at a kid at one versus three. That's a lot of aging.