Bryan Johnson· Author
The protocol is tailored to robust safety and efficacy markers based upon biofluids, devices and imaging.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
The protocol is tailored to robust safety and efficacy markers based upon biofluids, devices and imaging.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
every calorie, supplement and protocol has had to fight for it's life in the face of scientific evidence and personal measurement
so now the team is you know a few dozen people and we try to measure everything we can we try to match that up with gold standard scientific evidence and they create protocols for doing it
so if we can't measure it we typically don't do it
so what I take is based upon my team's analysis of the evidence and the measurements we get from my body
We look at the scientific evidence we do a baseline measurement in my body We Begin the protocol and then we measure again and repeat that cycle again and again
We follow the science and data no matter how outlandish the therapies may seem.
What I'm doing, right, is I'm introducing the concept. And it's really weird because they really should say what Brian is doing is really a good example of scientific measurement, right? Doing this stuff.
This is the protocol we've built. Measure, do a therapy, evaluate the data, and repeat that cycle again and again. no loyalties except for to science and data.