David Sinclair· PhD
Jerry, Sharon and the team continue to test our AAV-OSK rejuvenation tech on primates and see promising results treating damaged eyes 👀 with a view to treating people as soon as these studies are completed 👍
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Jerry, Sharon and the team continue to test our AAV-OSK rejuvenation tech on primates and see promising results treating damaged eyes 👀 with a view to treating people as soon as these studies are completed 👍
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.