The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So let's think about pelvic pain, for instance. You frequently will find people that have pelvic pain that will describe having lower back pain too. And it's because of this visceral somatic convergence in the spinal cord. It's not that there's something going on in their back. It's that these signals that are being driven heavily from the pelvis are coming in and connecting with the same regions from the back.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.