Peter Attia· MD
Daniel had started thinking about dogs as a model to understand gee how genetic and environmental factors influence the aging process
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Daniel had started thinking about dogs as a model to understand gee how genetic and environmental factors influence the aging process
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the environmental part of this I think is probably the most important from a what are we going to learn from dogs that we can't learn from mice perspective as you said dogs really share our environment to a greater extent than any other animal maybe with the exception of cats
dogs have some of that same genetic homogeneity if you look within individual purebred breeds but we also have many purebred breeds that are widely divergent both genetically and morphologically all you have to do is look at a chihuahua on a great day and write to see that divergence but we also have this really interesting and complex mixed breed population there's a combination of all these different genetic variants that each breed has
so they're a very powerful animal in which to understand aging and test interventions for that reason and you can do it in a time frame that's that's you know feasible
dogs share the human environment is another big one right and that's that's for me one of the most important because we cannot model that in the laboratory in fact we do exactly the opposite we really try to limit variation in environment to extreme measures dogs share our environment with the exception of diet share almost all aspects of the of the human environment and so that's a a bridge in some ways between laboratory studies and human studies
how working with companion dogs offers many advantages over working in mice beginning with some of the obvious like they're
so they've got this really interesting and powerful genetic architecture we have a couple hundred purebred breeds of dogs which you can almost think of as inbred strains right and then on top of that we have this mixed breed population and that's coupled with with phenotypic diversity so for almost any trait that you think about dogs are more diverse than people are
well first of all they're a heck of a lot closer to humans than than mice are but they're also not genetically in the way mice are they live in our environment not a sterile environment um they consume you know food that probably looks a little bit more uh like the food we would consume at least in some cases
well first of all they're a heck of a lot closer to humans than than mice are but they're also not genetically inbred the way mice are they live in our environment not a sterile environment they consume you know food that probably looks a little bit more like the food we would consume at least in some cases