The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so instead of going to the movies and say it cost me $10 is like that cost me 1 hour and 15 minutes of my time to go to this movie to buy this shirt it cost me 3 hours of my time and so you get this idea that I'm exchanging my life for certain things right the experience of buying a shirt going to the movie going on a trip and that hit me hard
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
by removing that abstraction right you get closer to your values right right imagine that you have $25 chips you figure out your hourly after tax Allin wage is 25 an hour every time you flick a chip it's like I gave an hour of my life boom boom boom so when you start thinking about things in terms of hours of your life and you have finite hours you start to really get closer to your values