The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now it depends in some cases, for instance the cocaine user, the addict that wants cocaine can't just think about cocaine and increase the amount of that's released about a thousand fold is actually much lower but it's just enough to put them on the motivation track for it to crave that particular thing.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if somebody craves cocaine what are they craving they're craving that dopamine Peak they're craving the increased level of alertness