The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if we look at rumen and agriculture it is regenerative in many ways it restores the quality of the soil it can decrease the amount of carbon in the atmosphere by increasing the soil carbon carrying capacity there was a recent study done from white oak pastures which showed that they were actually carbon negative because of the carbon sequestration in the soil there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the one metric that i believe will determine the persistence of humans on this planet is soil carbon and the best way the only way that i'm aware of to increase soil carbon is by having plants and animals together on a patch of land which requires proper regenerative grazing of ruminants on grasslands and in other ecosystems