Andrew Huberman· PhD
I can see in that example how it protects the conscious mind from risk because there's always a possibility of rejection there's a possibility of over interpretation of what the other person is talking to them for right
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I can see in that example how it protects the conscious mind from risk because there's always a possibility of rejection there's a possibility of over interpretation of what the other person is talking to them for right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.