The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can take someone who has eaten an edible and is profoundly intoxicated at and they will have possibly under 5 nanog per Mill of THC in their blood but you were talking about this metabolite that can come from the uh Edibles that doesn't come from inhalants that can have a much more get B from inhalent but not nearly as much as you get from Edibles
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the problem is with the way that um you detect it is you can take someone who's a chronic cannabis user and is completely sober and hasn't consumed in a day or two and their basil levels of THC in their blood may be higher than someone who's profoundly Intoxicated by an edible just by the sheer nature of the fact that it would reside in their fat tissue or their it would leak back into the blood