The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
my take away with regard to igf-1 and you can let me know if you agree with this is that we don't want to over stimulate it which is really what your book the switch is all about with both mTOR and igf-1 you know which are connected intimately that we don't want to overdo it and we should be aware of which things turn these genes on and off
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my take away with regard to igf-1 and you can let me know if you agree with this is that we don't want to over stimulate it which is really what your book the switch is all about with both mTOR and igf-1 you know which are connected intimately that we don't want to overdo it and we should be aware of which things turn these genes on and off