The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, I don't know if I'm reluctant to encourage people to shift toward a particular type of practice toward a particular type of vision. I think what you and I, I hope agree on, correct me if I'm wrong, is that exploring these different extremes and everything in between is where the real value is. Panoramic focused, eyes, head up, eyes down, head down, eyes up, playing with it and exploring it and as opposed to for the first 10 minutes of practice being panoramic vision.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.