Andrew Huberman· PhD
I just am remiss to believe this until I see some blinded data because I think outside of that we know how powerful an expectancy bias is
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I just am remiss to believe this until I see some blinded data because I think outside of that we know how powerful an expectancy bias is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because again you do see this in patient communities where they say well this strain helps my pain better than that strain and so it's like okay is there actual legitimacy to this or again is this just an expectancy bias