The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for these people there is a treatment it has to be done in a dermatologist office called pulse die laser where they use a laser of a particular wavelength that can penetrate excuse me The Superficial layers of the skin and now you know how different wavelengths of light can penetrate to different depths within skin and destroy the blood vessels or the broken blood vessels
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
called pulse die laser where they use a laser of a particular wavelength that can penetrate excuse me The Superficial layers of the skin and now you know how different wavelengths of light can penetrate to different depths within skin and destroy the blood vessels or the broken blood vessels that then call in immune system cells to clear out the destroyed endothelial cells and other stuff around it and take it away get rid of those blood vessels that sit beneath the surface