The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when it got approval in the US it was approved for narcolepsy where people are falling abruptly asleep during the day so it keeps them alert and awake there it also got approval for circadian sleep shift work disorder where because you're on a shift schedule you're sleeping weirdly and it got approval for daytime sleepiness from sleep apnea
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.