The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this thing we call the innate immune system is a generalized response system to go and combat viruses so it could be a cold it could be a flu it could be a bacteria it could be a fungus it could even be a physical object and your innate immune system responds by saying okay let's go deal with this
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the innate immune system is very fast and it is agnostic to the type of infection in fact it doesn't even matter if it's a bacterial physical fungal or viral infection but it certainly isn't paying attention to the exact serotype of cold virus or whether or not it's an H1 influenza or another type of influenza so way to think about the innate immune system is that it is a very fast and non-specific response to a viral or other type of Invader