The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So it seems to be something that is, for some reason, happening in illicit use. So now that brings in, okay, is there polypharmacology? - Right. - You know, 'cause you're drinking- - Did you take what you thought you took? - Yeah. What's the dose? What's the purity? - Yeah. - But then also, what I think is actually even more so, and what's likely going on, is some sort of very rare neurological susceptibility.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.