The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you make a broad recommendation for every woman who's done having kids to come in and have this done what if one in 20 surgeons is going to have a complication rate of 5% you've cancelled out all the public health benefit of reducing ovarian cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what is the probability um of taking out the fallopian tube and damaging an ovary such that a woman ultimately needs an ectomy as well which would be a disaster an absolute disaster for a woman to lose her ovaries if she's premenopausal and still relying on those for hormones