The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If you've gotten pregnant, regardless of the outcome of that pregnancy, if it's with the same partner, we can feel confident that they had sperm present. So that's already one leg up over never getting pregnant. If it was an intrauterine pregnancy, we know at least one fallopian tube was functioning. So that's also in the camp of we're checking some mental boxes of some of the things that we think about.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.