Paul Saladino· MD
epidemiology in general is extremely unreliable which is why i kept coming back to the fact that we should look at interventional studies
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
epidemiology in general is extremely unreliable which is why i kept coming back to the fact that we should look at interventional studies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when you're looking at an epidemiology study do you have to be careful are there any problems with epidemiology you have to be careful of I'm clearly leading you on here whether whether how like underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed a disease is maybe right what about like bias you guys you guys heard of bias ethnicities race all that like there might not be enough research done in a certain area which is dominated by a certain race so yeah that can be a bias that researcher bias too right have you guys heard of healthy user bias healthy user bias no unhealthy user bias