Andrew Huberman· PhD
So you're talking about a 10year benefit >> and that's a meta analysis of 350,000 participants. So that's that you can go to the bank with that like social community very good for the body.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So you're talking about a 10year benefit >> and that's a meta analysis of 350,000 participants. So that's that you can go to the bank with that like social community very good for the body.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.