The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I do recommend talking to a really good ophthalmologist if you have severe vision problems of any kind, or if you want to offset vision problems of any kind. An optometrist as well, but ideally would be a neuro-ophthalmologist.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And if you do have strong imbalances between the two eyes, which can be caused by cataract and lens issues, can be uh caused by neuromuscular issues, etc. to try and get those dealt with as early as possible by contacting a really good opthalmologist and ideally a neuroopthmologist.