The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And there's just like society's like accepting it. Like that. And okay, let's go read all the learning science papers about how middle school girls can't do math science. Okay, there are none. There's none. That doesn't exist, right? There's no such thing. But it's this total meme that they they believe.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And let's go read all the learning science papers about how middle school girls can't do math science. Okay, there are none. There's none. That doesn't exist, right? There's no such thing.
They've created a narrative that says I can't do math. Once it becomes this mastery based system, it's a decision, not an inherent capability. And there's this mental view of oh, I guess I am a smart kid.