The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
James is a friend of mine we do not see eye to eye on everything so this is definitely a friendly debate he's a farm D he's a really smart guy and just a really nice guy in general I enjoyed this conversation I enjoy who he is he's a doctor of pharmacy as I said he's a cardiovascular research scientist he's very well published he's written over 250 publications in the medical literature he's written three best-selling health books the salt fix super fuel the longevity solution
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.