The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and he he can feel it that's his subjective experience so I do this experiment with people all the time when they come to the air be me like go in the Wi-Fi tent go in the EMF tent and tell me how you feel and obviously it's not a blinded study right there's some some uh potential for confounding here but invariably people experience something subjectively when they get into that environment
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.