The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So when I came into the aging field in the early 1990s, it was all about antioxidants. And we thought that enzymes by the name of catalyze and superoxide dismutase, well, they're going to be the key to longevity. It turns out that it's largely been a failure that giving animals and humans antioxidants, haven't had the longevity benefits that we dreamed of.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.