The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can kind of just take one second if you're listening and press on your eyes just very lightly and you there's a little give of course the eyelids part of that give but but it's not it's not like rock hard and if we press and it feels under the eyelid like gosh something under there is Rock card then we know something is wrong that is way too high pressure if it's rock hard
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the old F truly old-fashioned eye pressure exam was you would close your eyes and the opthalmologist would gently press to see whether or not your eyes were more rigid than last time
but I'll tell you our ability to differentiate the fine points of eye pressure other than Rock Hard or not rock hard is pretty limited