The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what happens there is you get a metabolite called 11 hydroxy THC which seems to be a bit more potent than THC is in terms of its ability to activate the receptor so its efficacy at least at driving a response through CB1 receptors seems to be higher than what you would get uh with just the parent molecule of THC itself self — and so and it it seems to accumulate a lot more as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.