The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And so, we have to get rid of the carbon dioxide that we produce in particular because the carbon dioxide affects the acid base balance of the blood, the pH, and all living cells are very sensitive to what the pH value is, so your body is very interested in regulating that pH.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the brain is extraordinarily sensitive to changes in pH. If there's a big shift in carbon dioxide to be a big shift in brain pH and that'll throw your brain, if I can use the technical term, out of whack.